Categories
Anything

Coolidge effect aka "Oh No You Didn’t"

Coolidge effect

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In biology and psychology, the Coolidge effect is a phenomenon seen in mammalian species whereby males (and to a lesser extent females) exhibit renewed sexual interest if introduced to new receptive sexual partners,[1][2][3][4] even after refusing sex from prior but still available sexual partners.

Contents

Origin of the term

Ethologist Frank A. Beach is credited with naming the “Coolidge effect” in 1955, after one of his students suggested the term at a psychology conference.[5] He attributed the neologism to:[5]
… an old joke about Calvin Coolidge when he was President … The President and Mrs. Coolidge were being shown [separately] around an experimental government farm. When [Mrs. Coolidge] came to the chicken yard she noticed that a rooster was mating very frequently. She asked the attendant how often that happened and was told, “Dozens of times each day.” Mrs. Coolidge said, “Tell that to the President when he comes by.” Upon being told, President asked, “Same hen every time?” The reply was, “Oh, no, Mr. President, a different hen every time.” President: “Tell that to Mrs. Coolidge.”
The joke appears in a 1978 book (A New Look at Love, by Elaine Hatfield and G. William Walster, p. 75), citing an earlier source (footnote 19, Chapter 5).[6]

Empirical evidence

The original experiments with rats applied the following protocol:[7] A male rat was placed into an enclosed large box with four or five female rats in heat. He immediately began to mate with all the female rats again and again until eventually, he became exhausted. The females continued nudging and licking him, yet he did not respond. When a novel female was introduced into the box, he became alert and began to mate once again with the new female. This phenomenon is not limited to common rats.[8] The Coolidge effect is attributed to an increase in dopamine levels and the subsequent effect upon an animal’s limbic system.[9]
Human males experience a post-ejaculatory refractory period after sex. They are temporarily incapable of engaging in sex with the same female after ejaculation and require time to recover full sexual function. In popular reference, the Coolidge effect is the well-documented phenomenon that the post-ejaculatory refractory period is reduced or eliminated if a novel female becomes available.[10] This effect is cited by evolutionary biologists as one reason why males are more likely to desire sex with a greater number and variety of partners than females.[10]
While the Coolidge effect is usually seen demonstrated by males—that is, males displaying renewed excitement with a novel female—Lester and Gorzalka developed a model to determine whether or not the Coolidge effect also occurs in females. Their experiment, which used hamsters instead of rats, found that it does occur to a lesser degree in females.[3][4]

On simultaneous hermaphrodites

A 2007 study focusing on the Coolidge effect in simultaneously hermaphroditic species confirmed the validity of the Coolidge effect in freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis.[11] Biomphalaria glabrata, another simultaneous hermaphrodite freshwater snail, does not exhibit sex-specific effects of partner novelty, and thus there is no Coolidge effect in the species.[12]

See also

References

  1. ^ Reber, A. S. & Reber, E., The Penguin dictionary of psychology (3rd ed.), London: Penguin, ISBN 0-14-051451-1
  2. ^ Brown, R. E. (1974), “Sexual arousal, the Coolidge effect and dominance in the rat (Rattus norvegicus)”, Animal Behaviour 22 (3): 634–637, doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(74)80009-6
  3. a b Lester, GL; Gorzalka, BB (1988), “Effect of novel and familiar mating partners on the duration of sexual receptivity in the female hamster”, Behavioral Neural Biology 49 (3): 398–405, PMID 3408449
  4. a b Pinel, John (2007), Biopsychology (6th ed.), Boston: Pearson Allyn and Bacon, ISBN 0-205-42651-4
  5. a b Dewsbury, Donald A. (2000) “Frank A. Beach, Master Teacher,” Portraits of Pioneers in Psychology, Volume 4, p269-281
  6. ^ [1]
  7. ^ Beach, F. A. & Jordan, L. (1956), “Sexual Exhaustion and Recovery in the Male Rat”, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 8: 121–133
  8. ^ Wilson, J; Kuehn, R. & Beach, F. A. (1963), “Modifications in the Sexual Behavior of Male Rats Produced by Changing the Stimulus Female”, Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 56: 636–644
  9. ^ Fiorino, D. F.; Coury, A. & Phillips, A. G. (1997), “Dynamic Changes in Nucleus Accumbens Dopamine Efflux During the Coolidge Effect in Male Rats”Journal of Neuroscience 17 (12): 4849–4855
  10. a b Hergenhahn, B. R.; Olson, Matthew H. (2003), An introduction to theories of personality, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, pp. 396–397, ISBN 0-13-099226-7
  11. ^ Koene J. M. & Maat A. T. (6 November 2007) “Coolidge effect in pond snails: male motivation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite”. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 212. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-212
  12. ^ Häderer I. K., Werminghausen J., Michiels N. K., Timmermeyer N. & Anthes N. (12 October 2009) “No effect of mate novelty on sexual motivation in the freshwater snail Biomphalaria glabrata“. Frontiers in Zoology 66: 23. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-6-23.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: